AFFF Lawsuits: Firefighter Foam Lawsuit (October 2025 Update)

Firefighting is an extremely dangerous occupation for many reasons. Courageous first responders who put their lives on the line to save others deserve our respect and protection as they perform their jobs.

Unfortunately, research has discovered a link between firefighting foam, known as AFFF, and several serious medical conditions. 

As a result, almost 10,000 AFFF lawsuits have been filed nationwide, growing monthly.

Many of these claims have been brought by military firefighters routinely exposed to toxic chemicals in AFFF firefighting foams.

Possible AFFF Injuries

Exposure to toxic chemicals embedded in AFFF firefighting foam, such as PFAS and other forever chemicals, has been linked to several different cancers for which lawsuits have been filed. Specifically, long-term exposure to PFAS has been linked to:

Kidney Cancer: Kidneys usually act as blood strainers, removing unnecessary and harmful substances like PFAS before the blood is recycled. This likely makes kidney cells more susceptible to developing gene mutations from interacting with toxic PFAS, which can become kidney cancer if the damaged cells reproduce unchecked. 

Testicular Cancer: This uncommon type of cancer begins in the part of the male reproductive system where sperm is made. Cells altered by PFAS exposure multiply and crowd out healthy cells, compromising the testes' ability to function normally. Rates of testicular cancer are typically higher among firefighters, who are regularly exposed to PFAS through AFFF.

Bladder Cancer: When flawed bladder cells, typically the urothelial cells, begin to reproduce out of control, this is known as bladder cancer. Researchers believe the bladder’s role in the urinary system, which helps rid the body of waste like PFAS, may explain its ties to PFAS exposure.

Prostate Cancer: This is a common type of cancer that originates in the prostate gland in men, which helps with sperm growth. At this point, research indicates that higher levels of exposure to PFAS are likely correlated with prostate cancer.

Liver Cancer: Approximately 11,000 women and 25,000 men are diagnosed with liver cancer each year in the United States.

Breast Cancer: Contrary to popular belief, breast cancer can occur in both men and women. Cells with defective DNA overproduce and outnumber healthy cells, often leading to a cancerous mass or lump in the breast. PFAS are known to mess with hormones, and cancers of the reproductive system, like breast cancer, are known to be triggered by fluctuating hormone levels. 

Leukemia and Lymphoma: These two types of cancer develop in white blood cells, a key part of your body’s immune response. Leukemia can be particularly dangerous because it begins in the bone marrow but is aided in metastasizing by the bloodstream. Lymphoma is found in damaged white blood cells in the lymph nodes or spleen. Individuals who regularly come into contact with PFAS through AFFF are absorbing toxins that can easily infiltrate the blood, laying the groundwork for these kinds of cancer.

Rectal cancer: As flawed cells located in the rectum multiply, they can accumulate into polyps before becoming rectal cancer. As PFAS make their way through the digestive system over time, they may negatively affect the DNA of large intestine cells where the rectum is located. Rates of rectal cancer are higher among firefighters, who frequently handle AFFF-containing PFAS. 

Fertility issues: This includes difficulty conceiving and potentially a higher likelihood of having a stillbirth or miscarriage. Studies have found that women with significant levels of PFAS in their systems may have hormone imbalances that make it difficult for them to get pregnant.

Ulcerative colitis: (UC) is an autoimmune disease that causes the colon and the rectum to be irritated due to an overactive immune response. PFAS may weaken the lining of the digestive tract, making people exposed to high levels of PFAS more prone to inflammation in these areas. 

Thyroid cancer: This type of cancer starts in the thyroid gland, which plays a critical role in producing hormones. As discussed, PFAS interferes with the body’s hormone response, and some studies have found that PFAS exposure leads to a 56% increased risk of developing thyroid cancer.

Colorectal cancer: Colorectal cancer develops in the large intestine, which is responsible for the final stages of the digestive process before waste is excreted. PFAS may harm cells in the colon and rectum as the body attempts to process the toxins before growing unrestrained and compromising organ function. 

AFFF Firefighting Foam Lawsuit

If you're a firefighter with a history of AFFF exposure or have encountered these dangerous chemicals elsewhere, it's crucial to contact an AFFF cancer lawyer right away.

You may be entitled to compensation for the legal damages and financial losses you have suffered due to AFFF-related illnesses, including related medical bills and lost income.

You are not alone. People just like you have filed numerous AFFF foam lawsuits across the nation.

Aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF) is widely used as a fire suppressant when water is ineffective or dangerous for battling a fire. Various chemicals in AFFF, including PFAS, are necessary to create compounds that work well on certain fires.

However, these same chemicals are now considered toxic and carcinogenic, with devastating effects on human health. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has stated, "There is evidence that exposure to PFAS can lead to adverse health outcomes in humans."

Kidney cancer, liver cancer, prostate cancer, and testicular cancer are the most common diseases associated with AFFF firefighting foam.

Don't wait any longer, call us or submit your case for review today!

Contact Us

Firefighting Foam Cancer Lawsuits - August Updates

Bookmark this page for future reference. We will continue adding updates as new developments occur in the AFFF litigation.

Our goal remains to be the most current update of AFFF lawsuits on the internet.  What started as a firefighting foam class action lawsuit has evolved into multidistrict litigation (also known as an "MDL").  

In an MDL, all lawsuits filed in Federal Courts throughout the United States are consolidated in a single jurisdiction before one Judge for coordinated discovery and pretrial proceedings. This is done for efficiency by preventing inconsistent rulings from throughout the country.  

In 2021, all AFFF firefighting foam lawsuits filed in Federal courts throughout the nation were consolidated before Judge Richard Gergel in the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina. What started out as the AFFF class action lawsuit has evolved into multidistrict litigation that continues to grow. 

We can anticipate the first AFFF personal injury claims will proceed to bellwether trials within the next year. The claims left to be resolved are on behalf of individual firefighters exposed to AFFF.  Here are the latest updates on the progress of this litigation.

October 1, 2025 - Unexpected Surge in New Filings Changes Litigation Direction

The AFFF firefighting foam litigation surged forward in September with a massive increase in filings, progress in the ulcerative colitis bellwether process, and ongoing uncertainty around the timing of a potential settlement.

37,000+ New Cases Filed in One Week

The AFFF multidistrict litigation (MDL) saw an unprecedented jump in case volume last week. More than 37,000 new lawsuits were filed in response to the short-term “Filing Facilitation Window” established by Judge Richard Gergel, who is presiding over the federal MDL.

This surge more than tripled the size of the MDL, which had just over 12,000 cases at the start of the month. With this explosive growth, the AFFF MDL is now one of the largest mass tort proceedings in the United States.

While the September 5 deadline has passed, plaintiffs can still explore additional legal options. However, these may fall outside the MDL structure.

Ulcerative Colitis Cases Advance

On September 16, Judge Gergel approved the selection of three additional ulcerative colitis plaintiffs to move into Tier 2 discovery as part of the Group B bellwether process. One of these cases, along with a previously selected plaintiff, will later proceed to expert discovery. These cases may help determine how courts handle PFAS-related digestive illness claims in the future.

Veterans Still Waiting for Accountability

Many AFFF plaintiffs are veterans or military families exposed to toxic foam on U.S. bases. Despite mounting scientific evidence and strict new EPA standards for PFAS in drinking water, there is still no national registry to track exposure and long-term health effects.

Advocates say that until Congress or the VA takes action, litigation remains the only path to accountability for those harmed by decades of PFAS contamination from exposure to AFFF foam.

Settlement Possibilities Uncertain

Despite earlier signs of progress, no settlement has been reached in the AFFF litigation. Court activity suggests a renewed focus on preparing for the first bellwether trials, including expert discovery and pretrial motions. That said, a global settlement is still possible, and future developments could shift the course of the litigation once again.

September 1, 2025 - AFFF Litigation Moving Quickly Toward Settlement, File Now to Participate

The AFFF multidistrict litigation (MDL) continues to evolve quickly, with more than 12,000 personal injury lawsuits now pending. A combination of scientific breakthroughs, legal deadlines, and judicial pressure is accelerating the pace of this litigation and likely moving it toward a global settlement.

First Trial Delayed to Allow Final Wave of Filings

Judge Richard Gergel recently issued a new court order that postpones the first bellwether personal injury trial in the AFFF MDL. The delay was prompted by a surge in unfiled claims, which the court said could disrupt settlement efforts and trial preparations.

• A 21-day “Filing Facilitation Window” has been created, running through September 5, 2025.
  
• All personal injury cases involving six core conditions—kidney cancer, testicular cancer, liver cancer, thyroid cancer, thyroid disease, and ulcerative colitis—must be filed during this window.
  
• Plaintiffs must submit documentation proving their diagnosis, PFAS exposure (such as contaminated drinking water or firefighting foam), and residence history.
  

Although not officially labeled a deadline, the September 5 date could function as a cutoff to join the litigation and participate in a future settlement. If you believe you have a claim, the time to act is now. Contact our team today.

New Study Ties PFAS to Genetic Changes and Cancer Risk

A recent study in Environmental Research strengthens the scientific link between PFAS exposure and disease. Researchers found that firefighters exposed to PFAS—especially from AFFF—had significant changes in microRNAs, the molecules that regulate genes involved in cancer suppression and immune system function.

• The study linked PFAS exposure to changes associated with kidney, liver, bladder, and blood cancers, as well as neurodegenerative and autoimmune diseases.
  
• These findings support claims that PFAS are not just present in the body; they may actively disrupt biological systems in ways that increase disease risk over time.
  

Former Firefighter Files New Case

On August 5, 2025, a former firefighter from Arcola, Illinois, filed a new lawsuit in the MDL after being diagnosed with kidney cancer. The plaintiff, who served in both military and civilian fire departments, alleges repeated exposure to PFAS from firefighting foam and contaminated drinking water.

His complaint names multiple chemical manufacturers and suppliers, accusing them of knowingly distributing dangerous products without proper warnings. The case underscores the growing number of occupational exposure claims driving this litigation forward.

Veterans Still Waiting for Help

A significant number of AFFF plaintiffs are veterans or military families, but there’s still no national registry to track PFAS exposure at contaminated bases or monitor long-term health effects. Many veterans face bureaucratic obstacles while trying to prove their illnesses are service-connected.

Until federal support improves, litigation remains the only viable path to compensation and accountability for many of these families.

Key Takeaways This Month

With a likely settlement on the horizon, the court is urging all eligible plaintiffs to file by September 5, 2025. If you or a loved one developed cancer or another illness after exposure to firefighting foam or PFAS-contaminated water, now is the time to speak with the Lawsuit Legal News team about your legal options.

Don’t miss your chance to be part of a possible global settlement by waiting too long. Call us today.

August 1, 2025 - AFFF Firefighting Foam Lawsuits Surge as New Group of Firefighters File Claims in IL and Settlement Momentum Builds

The Aqueous Film-Forming Foam (AFFF) litigation continues to gain traction, with a notable spike in new cases and growing indications that a global settlement may be on the horizon. These developments could have major implications for thousands of individuals, especially firefighters, exposed to toxic PFAS chemicals through firefighting foam or protective gear.

New Group Firefighter Lawsuit Filed in Illinois

A newly filed lawsuit in Madison County, Illinois, is drawing national attention. The complaint was brought by a group of current and former civilian and military firefighters from across the U.S. who allege serious health issues linked to prolonged PFAS exposure. The suit names more than 50 manufacturers and distributors, including 3M, DuPont, and Chemours.

According to the complaint, these companies knew for decades about the health dangers associated with PFAS (chemicals commonly found in AFFF and firefighting gear) but failed to warn users or take their products off the market. The plaintiffs have been diagnosed with a range of serious medical conditions, including testicular, kidney, and thyroid cancer, as well as ulcerative colitis and thyroid disease.

The defendants are expected to seek removal of the case to the federal multidistrict litigation (MDL) currently underway in South Carolina, which now serves as the central hub for thousands of similar claims.

MDL Reaches 11,000+ Cases Amid Talk of Settlement

The AFFF MDL continues to expand rapidly, adding 705 new lawsuits in just the past month, bringing the total case count to more than 11,000. This sharp increase reflects a critical moment in the litigation, with many plaintiffs' firms working to file claims before a potential settlement is reached.

Although no settlement has been formally announced, signs point toward meaningful progress. Discovery is mostly complete, bellwether trial plans are in place, and both sides appear to be operating with the procedural focus that often signals serious negotiations.

Why Timing Matters

While no outcome is guaranteed, the current phase of the AFFF litigation may represent a closing window for new plaintiffs. If you or someone you love has been diagnosed with cancer or another illness after repeated exposure to firefighting foam, now is the time to explore your legal options.

Lawsuit Legal News continues to accept and monitor these cases closely. Contact our team to learn whether you qualify to file an AFFF lawsuit or join the ongoing MDL before it’s too late.

July 1, 2025 - Under Pressure From the October Trial Date, Settlement Becomes More Likely This Summer

Many firefighters, military personnel, and residents harmed by PFAS-laden foam feel that justice has moved slowly. At Lawsuit Legal News, we remain optimistic that patience will be rewarded, possibly as early as this summer. Recent court actions suggest that things may be about to pick up speed.

Court Pressure & Settlement Climate

• On June 22, the presiding judge urged 3M, DuPont, BASF, Johnson Controls, and others to resolve personal-injury claims before the October bellwether trial.
• Water-system settlements have already eclipsed $13 billion, so these defendants know the financial stakes of the pending personal injury claims.

Road to the First Trial

• A June 17 scheduling order set firm rules: coordinated juror questionnaires, requiring both sides to disclose their 500 core exhibits in advance, and setting schedules for all pre-trial matters before trial starts on October 20, 2025. The court has not chosen which one of three kidney-cancer plaintiffs will lead the way.

Fresh Scientific Support

• A 2020-23 Arizona study (≈2,000 participants) confirms firefighters carry the highest blood serum levels of PFHxS, PFOS, and PFHpS. This data fortifies the causation claims presented in the pending litigation.

Why Timing Matters

• With more than 10,000 suits in the MDL and the judge signaling impatience, the window to join is quickly narrowing. Our team is optimistic that the defendants will try to settle these cases late this summer, before the first trial starts in October. If you are still considering joining this MDL, speaking with one of the AFFF lawsuit lawyers at LLN now can protect your right to share in any upcoming settlement.

June 1, 2025 - Kidney Cancer Bellwether Trial Approaches

The AFFF multidistrict litigation (MDL No. 2873) now includes over 9,300 personal injury lawsuits, with a recent surge of 414 new filings in April alone, likely in anticipation of potential settlement discussions.

Upcoming Bellwether Trial (Kidney Cancer Focus)

• The first personal injury bellwether trial is scheduled for October 20, 2025. To minimize jury confusion, it will focus exclusively on kidney cancer claims.
• Judge Richard Gergel is still deciding whether to try one or up to three plaintiffs together in this trial.
• Plaintiffs want to consolidate cases for efficiency and impact; defendants prefer a single-plaintiff trial, favoring the Voelker case, despite its complications.
• Plaintiffs argue that Donnelly or Speers would better meet the court’s goal of testing general and specific causation without unnecessary distractions.

Arguments for Consolidation

• Plaintiffs proposed consolidating five cases (involving both kidney and testicular cancer) due to shared:
  • Exposure to the same AFFF products
  • Contamination from the same military sites near Willow Grove, PA
  • Use of Pennsylvania law, common experts, and similar medical narratives
• Benefits of consolidation:
  • Avoids repetitive trials
  • Enhances jury understanding by reinforcing patterns
  • Limits defense strategies focused on isolating individual plaintiffs

Next Steps

• Daubert (expert witness) and summary judgment rulings are expected later this summer.
• A Science Day is scheduled for June 20, 2025, to present research on links between PFAS exposure and cancer.
• The judge will revisit case consolidation decisions based on these developments.

May 1, 2025 - Settlement Momentum Building: "Final Lap" of the Litigation

The AFFF firefighting foam multidistrict litigation (MDL) appears to be nearing a critical turning point. Lawyers and parties involved are pushing hard to finalize cases, and some attorneys have already stopped accepting new claims, anticipating a potential settlement announcement.

Important: If you are considering filing a claim, the time to act is now. Once settlement negotiations close, there will likely be no advance warning — new claims could be shut out without notice.

Right now, case reviews are moving at a rapid pace. Law firms are carefully verifying product identification, exposure evidence, and medical records to determine which claims qualify for settlement discussions. The litigation feels very much in its "final lap," with heightened urgency across the board.

Upcoming Science Day: Focus on Liver and Thyroid Cancer

The presiding judge has scheduled a Science Day for June 20, 2025, immediately following the regular MDL status conference in Charleston, South Carolina.

This session will focus on the two cancer types most commonly linked to AFFF exposure in the lawsuits:

• Liver cancer
• Thyroid cancer

During Science Day:

• Each side (plaintiffs and defendants) will present four expert witnesses — two for each type of cancer.
• Presentations are intended to educate the Court, not argue the case.
• The event will be off the record and cannot be cited later, but it remains a pivotal moment.
• No direct questioning will occur, but lawyers are expected to carefully craft each presentation to influence the judge’s understanding of PFAS science and cancer causation.

The way the Court interprets the scientific evidence could significantly impact future rulings on expert testimony and the overall direction of the MDL.

Case Count Update: Litigation Continues to Grow

The AFFF MDL continues to grow steadily:

• 498 new cases were added in March 2025, matching the increase from February.
• Total cases pending: 8,928 lawsuits.

This surge comes as discovery deadlines approach, especially for claims involving thyroid and liver cancers, which are central to the upcoming Science Day presentations.

New Deadlines for Expert Disclosures

The Court has set the following key deadlines:

• Plaintiffs' expert reports (liver and thyroid cancer cases): Due July 11, 2025
• Defendants' expert reports: Due August 22, 2025

These deadlines only apply to plaintiffs alleging liver or thyroid cancer.
For plaintiffs with other conditions — such as kidney cancer, testicular cancer, ulcerative colitis, or thyroid disease — the original pretrial schedules remain in place.

Bottom Line:
The AFFF firefighting foam litigation is rapidly approaching major milestones. With settlement discussions heating up and critical scientific evidence about to be presented, May 2025 marks an important moment for all involved plaintiffs and their attorneys.

Earlier AFFF Litigation News

At Lawsuit Legal News, our AFFF team, led by Attorney Matthew Dolman of Dolman Law Group, is carefully monitoring the possibility of punitive damage awards. Based on decades-old misconduct by DuPont and 3M, we believe there's a good chance that juries will award punitive damages to injured plaintiffs to punish the corporate activities that placed profits over safety.

For example, there is evidence that in the 1960s, DuPont acknowledged the dangers of AFFF when it warned its workers to use extreme care when handling these chemicals. In the 1970s, studies revealed contaminated fish near the 3M chemical plants. Then, in the 1980s, DuPont pulled all women from its PFAS factory after several female workers gave birth to severely deformed children.

Our team continues to accept AFFF claims, but with the likelihood of a settlement looming, there’s not much time left. Reach out today if you are considering your legal options. Don’t be left out of a possible global settlement.

April 1, 2025 - Another Jump in New Case Filings, Court

[/faq_block]

Why Choose Lawsuit Legal News and Dolman Law Group to Guide You Through an AFFF Lawsuit?

Working with experienced firefighting foam cancer lawyers like the team at Dolman Law Group can help you create a successful AFFF firefighting foam cancer lawsuit to recover the financial compensation you need.

Without the assistance of a skilled AFFF lawyer, you may face ongoing financial struggles and continued stress as you try to deal with your circumstances alone.

AFFF lawsuits filed in the pending multi-district litigation (MDL) involve high-profile defendants with the resources to mount a strong defense.

If you have been harmed by AFFF foam exposure, our dedicated firefighting foam cancer lawyers can level the playing field for you and dramatically increase your odds of receiving the full amount of compensation you deserve.  The Dolman Law Group team remains ready, willing, and able to assist you with an AFFF cancer lawsuit. Contact us today to learn more.

What to Expect When You Partner With the Lawyers Affiliated With Lawsuit Legal News

When you work with the experienced AFFF lawyers affiliated with Lawsuit Legal News (LLN), you'll have peace of mind knowing that your case is in the hands of a professional litigator with a vested interest in recovering the maximum compensation from the parties that harmed you.

Of course, the best personal injury attorneys do more than just offer legal advice and represent you during negotiations or in court. They also provide the resources and services needed to make the process of filing a lawsuit more convenient and worry-free when you are recovering from demanding injuries or illnesses. 

What to Expect From Your AFFF Lawyer

Your AFFF lawyer will help you complete and file the necessary documentation for your firefighting foam cancer claim. They can also help determine what damages you can claim and calculate the maximum amount to request.

Most of all, using extensive knowledge and negotiating skills, the team at LLN will fight for the best possible settlement to help you get the most financial compensation to cover the full extent of your damages.

If a settlement is not possible, you need a litigator who is willing to take your case to trial and advocate for your rights. Attorney Matt Dolman has built a reputation as an aggressive trial attorney who won’t back down. Let him fight for you, too.

The Award-Winning Dolman Law Group Team Has Recovered Millions of Dollars for Injured People Like You

At Dolman Law Group, we are the legal team behind LLN, and we have an extensive, successful history of helping injury victims recover the financial losses they need to protect their futures. Since opening our offices in 2004, we have helped more than 40,000 clients and recovered more than $400 million in settlements and verdicts. 

Our lead attorney, Matt Dolman, is an award-winning, highly respected advocate and a lifetime member of the Multi-Million Dollar Advocates Forum because of the results he has achieved for his clients. He is also a nationally recognized firefighting foam attorney.

Our legal professionals supporting LLN have more than 120 years of legal experience and ample resources to successfully resolve large mass tort claims against corporate giants like 3M, DuPont, and Tyco. When you need tough advocates fighting for your legal rights, look no further than Lawsuit Legal News.

What is Aqueous Film Forming Foam (AFFF)?

When most people think of firefighters battling fires, they usually picture brave men and women using fire hoses to spray water and douse rampant flames. In most cases, firefighting relies on this tried and true method of combatting a blaze, but there are some instances where water is not a viable option. 

For example, where fires involve certain chemicals or fuel, adding water can worsen the situation. In flammable liquid situations, firefighters turn to aqueous film-forming foam, commonly known as AFFF. When this substance is sprayed onto fires, it creates a foam that turns into a film that smothers the flames by restricting oxygen until the fire is extinguished.

AFFF is usually purchased in a concentrated form that is mixed with water before its use. It comes in 3% or 6% variations depending on the mixture's water ratio. AFFF has been used since the 1960s when it was invented for use by the military primarily as a fire suppression tool for fuel fires. 

The Future of Firefighting Foam

Although AFFF has been used extensively for decades, its days are numbered.  After so many firefighters and military members have reported illnesses and other medical conditions following exposure to firefighting foam, AFFF has come under scrutiny.  AFFF firefighting foam is being phased out due to an increased risk of cancer being discovered.

The phase-out of this product's use by the military is supposed to be completed by 2024, and many civilian institutions have since discontinued its use as well. They are working on a number of alternatives to combat fires caused by flammable liquids.  The dangers posed by toxic chemicals such as PFAS greatly outweigh the benefits of utilizing this product.

Of course, for some people, these actions come too late. Hundreds of product liability AFFF lawsuits have been filed around the country seeking fair compensation for those who have been diagnosed with cancer or other serious conditions as a result of their exposure to AFFF. The federal cases have been consolidated into multi-district litigation (MDL) to ensure consistent evidence disclosure and judicial rulings to protect these plaintiffs facing an uncertain future.

Aqueous Film Forming Foam (AFFF) Lawsuits FAQs

Others Who May Experience AFFF Exposure and Bring an AFFF Firefighting Foam Lawsuit

While firefighters are the most at-risk group for harmful AFFF exposure, other people also can come into contact with AFFF in sufficient amounts and recurrence that they may face serious health risks.

Military personnel is at high risk for AFFF exposure because this product is commonly used in military settings such as airfields and ships to combat potential fuel fires.

Airport personnel can also be at risk for contact with AFFF since many airports have a history of using firefighting foam.

The LLN team also represents several airport workers who were exposed to high levels of PFAS while working as airport firefighters and training extensively with AFFF firefighting foam. This, in turn, impacted the drinking water with unacceptable levels of dangerous chemicals such as PFAS.

Some Claimants Were Harmed by Exposure to Persistent AFFF in the Environment

AFFF is made with chemicals that are forever resistant to breaking down safely in the environment. AFFF that is improperly disposed of can easily seep into the water table and end up in the bodies of residents and wildlife.

Areas that regularly use AFFF, such as military bases, airports, and firefighter training facilities, have been tested and show dangerous levels of PFAS in the water. 

People that live in the vicinity of sites where AFFF is used regularly are at an increased risk of exposure to harmful PFAS that can elevate their risk of cancer and other serious health concerns. 

If you have received a cancer diagnosis following exposure to toxic firefighting foam, call our firefighting foam lawyers today for a free consultation at 866-535-9515 or email me at matt@dolmanlaw.com.

Who are the AFFF Manufacturers & Defendants

The LLN team is currently investigating claims involving the following AFFF manufacturers:

• Tyco Fire Products
• 3M Company
• Dupont
• Chemguard
• Kiddr Fire Fighting
• Buckeye Fire Equipment
• Chemours Company

Contact an AFFF Lawsuit Attorney at Lawsuit Legal News About Your Firefighting Foam Lawsuit Today

If you have been injured due to AFFF foam exposure, it's best to consult with an experienced firefighting foam lawyer with experience in AFFF lawsuits as soon as possible.

Partnering with a skilled attorney at Lawsuit Legal News and Dolman Law Group will help you gather the necessary evidence to prepare your firefighting foam cancer lawsuit effectively and create a solid legal claim. Contact our experienced firefighting foam lawyers today.

Our AFFF firefighting foam lawyers remain ready, willing, and able to help you file a lawsuit and seek compensation for the harm and losses you sustained from exposure to harmful chemicals. We are working on claims against every conceivable firefighting form manufacturer, including giant corporations such as Chevron, 3M, DuPont, and Chemguard.

Don't wait any longer! Call 866-535-9515 or submit your case for review today!