Roundup Lawsuit: Roundup Cancer Class Action Lawsuit (November 2024 Update)

Legally Reviewed

Matthew Dolman has written and reviewed this article for legal accuracy and clarity. Matthew has been a licensed attorney for twenty (20) years, has represented over ten thousand clients, and has collected over $250,000,000.00 in compensation for injury victims. Additionally, he has been representing individuals impacted by Paraquat exposure since the beginning of this lawsuit. The Dolman Law Group has been directly involved in the Paraquat Parkinson's Disease Lawsuit, and our goal remains to provide the most up-to-date information on this case.

Fact-Checked

Lawsuit Legal News does everything possible to ensure this Roundup Lawsuit page is up-to-date and accurate. If you need specific legal advice about your case, contact us. This article should not be taken as advice from an attorney and does create an attorney-client relationship.

The Roundup lawsuits have become one of the most significant legal battles in recent years. They center around claims that the widely used weedkiller Roundup causes cancer, specifically non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. The manufacturer, Monsanto, which makes Roundup, has faced thousands of lawsuits from individuals alleging that exposure to Roundup led to their cancer diagnoses. Despite Roundup’s substantial settlement offers and ongoing legal defenses, the litigation continues to evolve, with new cases and verdicts regularly emerging.

Thousands of Roundup cancer lawsuits have been combined into multidistrict litigation (MDL) overseen by Judge Vince Chhabria in the United States Northern District of California federal court. Plaintiffs claim that glyphosate, Roundup's main ingredient, caused their non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and other cancers and illnesses. There is some scientific debate around the risks, but these lawsuits are built on sound science, as seen by settlements already paid by Monsanto and their parent company, Bayer. 

Since the Roundup lawsuits have been going on for years, the number of federal cases has reduced because of settlements and most cases shifting to state courts for trial.

Essentially, the MDL has served its purpose of consolidating pretrial matters and encouraging settlements for a large number of similar cases. However, the federal MDL is still active, and, as we mentioned, it is possible to file with your state court in order to pursue compensation if you believe your non-Hodgkin lymphoma or another type of cancer was caused by exposure to Roundup herbicide.

Click Here to View the Latest Roundup Lawsuit Update

Purpose of This Page

This page aims to provide an updated, comprehensive overview of the Roundup lawsuits as of July 2024. It covers the history, health risks, legal grounds, and other important concepts, as well as provides guidance for those considering filing their own lawsuits. Our goal is to inform and assist individuals in navigating the complex legal issues surrounding the Roundup Lawsuits.

Roundup Lawsuit Table of Contents

Roundup Cancer Lawsuit Updates

Lawsuit Legal News believes that keeping the public and potential and current plaintiffs up to date on the cases that affect them is of the utmost importance. That is why we strive to keep all of our pages, including the Roundup Cancer Lawsuit page, updated with the latest news about the case.

📘 Bookmark this page to stay up-to-date on the Roundup Lawsuit.

August 1, 2024 - Roundup Lawsuit Update At The Close of July 2024

As of the closing of July 2024, Monsanto has settled almost 100,000 lawsuits in the Roundup cases, amounting to around $11 billion in settlements. Bayer reached this number by making large settlement deals with lawyers handling many cases and by settling with some plaintiffs before going to trial.

Even though these settlements amount to nearly two-thirds of all Roundup claims, it's estimated that there are still 54,000 active lawsuits remaining. Most of these are in state courts, but over 4,000 cases are still pending in the federal Roundup MDL lawsuit in California federal case.

The Background on Roundup Lawsuits and Injuries

Development and Usage

Roundup was developed by Monsanto in the 1970s as an efficient solution for weed control. Its success is attributed to glyphosate, which inhibits an essential enzyme in plants. By the 1980s, Roundup became widely adopted in agriculture, forestry, and home gardening, praised for its effectiveness and ease of use. However, its widespread use has led to increased scrutiny over its safety and environmental impact.

Manufacturer: Monsanto/Bayer

Monsanto, founded in 1901, has been a significant force in the agricultural chemical industry. The company introduced the weedkiller product Roundup in the 1970s, and its massive success made Monsanto a dominant force in the herbicide market. 

Over the years, Monsanto has faced numerous allegations and lawsuits, including claims of deceptive marketing practices, environmental damage, and aggressive business practices. 

In addition to its issues with deceptive marketing, environmental damage, and cancer-causing products, another huge issue with Monsanto is their use of strong-arm tactics to control seed markets and stifle competition. This includes filing patent lawsuits against farmers who allegedly used Monsanto seeds without authorization, even if the seeds spread into their farm from nearby farms—a completely natural process. 

Additionally, they don't allow farmers to keep seeds from a year's harvest and replant them (which farmers have been doing for tens of thousands of years). Instead, farmers need to buy new seeds from Monsanto every year. Farmers are also forced to only use Monsanto products on their Monsanto crops, monopolizing the industry and making the farmers slave-like to the corporation. 

In 2018, Bayer acquired Monsanto, inheriting its legal battles, including the ongoing Roundup litigation. Bayer has since faced significant financial and reputational challenges due to the mounting lawsuits and adverse verdicts.

What is Glyphosate?

Glyphosate is a non-selective herbicide, meaning it kills most plants it comes into contact with. It is used extensively in agriculture to control weeds and improve crop yields. Despite its widespread use, glyphosate has been the subject of numerous studies and regulatory reviews due to concerns about its potential health risks. The World Health Organization's classification of glyphosate as a probable human carcinogen has intensified the debate over its safety.

Controversies Surrounding Glyphosate

Glyphosate has been at the center of significant controversy due to the health and environmental risks.

• Cancer Concerns: The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classified glyphosate as "probably carcinogenic to humans." This classification has fueled concerns about its safety.
• Lawsuits: Thousands of lawsuits have been filed against Monsanto (now Bayer) alleging that glyphosate herbicides, particularly Roundup, caused non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
• Environmental Impact: Glyphosate's wide use has raised concerns about its impact on soil microorganisms, water quality, and biodiversity.
• Herbicide Resistance: The extensive use—and some might say the overuse—of glyphosate has led to the emergence of glyphosate-resistant weeds, which has caused the increased need for herbicide applications and potentially exacerbated environmental problems.
• Regulatory Battles: Regulatory agencies worldwide have wrestled with determining the appropriate level of glyphosate regulation, with each of them coming up with varying conclusions about its safety.

Regulatory Status

The regulatory status of glyphosate varies worldwide. While it remains approved for use in many countries, concerns about its safety have led to stricter regulations and bans in some regions. The World Health Organization's International Agency for Research on Cancer classified glyphosate as a "probable human carcinogen" in 2015, which has significantly influenced public perception and regulatory decisions.

Health Risks Associated with Roundup Weedkiller

Various studies have explored the health impacts of glyphosate exposure. Research by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) highlighted potential links between glyphosate and cancer, particularly non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Other studies have examined glyphosate's effects on genetic material, suggesting it may cause genetic mutations and epigenetic changes. Despite conflicting results, the growing body of evidence has raised significant concerns about glyphosate's safety.

The WHO's IARC classified glyphosate as "probably carcinogenic to humans" (Group 2A). This classification is based on limited evidence of carcinogenicity in humans and sufficient evidence in animals. The IARC report highlighted studies showing DNA damage and chromosomal damage in human cells exposed to glyphosate, which could lead to cancer development.

Studies and Findings Linking Roundup and Cancer

The connection between Roundup and cancer has been a major focus of scientific research and litigation. Numerous studies have investigated whether glyphosate, the active ingredient in Roundup, is carcinogenic. Here is an overview of key studies and their findings:

• International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) Report: In 2015, the IARC, part of the World Health Organization (WHO), classified glyphosate as a "probable human carcinogen." This classification was based on "limited evidence" of cancer in humans (from real-world exposures) and "sufficient evidence" of cancer in experimental animals (from studies of pure glyphosate).
• Agricultural Health Study (AHS): This long-term study, funded by the National Cancer Institute and other agencies, has followed the health of thousands of agricultural workers. An update published in 2018 found no statistically significant association between glyphosate use and overall cancer incidence, including non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. However, some researchers have criticized the study's methodology and potential biases.
• Meta-analyses and Reviews: Several meta-analyses have attempted to consolidate findings from multiple studies to provide a clearer picture. A 2019 meta-analysis found that high exposure to glyphosate-based herbicides (GBHs) was associated with a 41% increased risk of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). This analysis included data from multiple case-control studies and the AHS.
• Animal Studies: Laboratory studies on animals have shown that glyphosate exposure can lead to cancer in rodents. These findings support the IARC's classification but have been challenged by industry-funded studies that did not find similar results.

Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma

Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma is a type of cancer that originates in the lymphatic system, which is part of the body's immune system. It involves the uncontrolled growth of lymphocytes, a type of white blood cell. There are various subtypes of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, each with different characteristics and treatment options. The association between glyphosate and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma has been a central issue in the Roundup lawsuits, with many plaintiffs alleging that their cancer was caused by prolonged exposure to the herbicide.

The alleged link between glyphosate and NHL is supported by several case-control studies, where researchers compare the exposure histories of cancer patients (cases) to those without cancer (controls). These studies have found higher rates of NHL among individuals with occupational or residential exposure to glyphosate-based herbicides.

Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma primarily affects the lymphatic system, but its impact can be widespread. Key issues include:

• Lymph node enlargement: The abnormal growth of lymphocytes leads to swollen lymph nodes throughout the body.
• Immune system dysfunction: Increased number of abnormal lymphocytes which interferes with the body's ability to fight infections.
• Organ involvement: Lymphoma can spread to other organs, such as the liver, spleen, bone marrow, and lungs and dramatically diminish their function.
• Fatigue and weakness: The body's energy becomes depleted due to the cancer and the demands of cancer treatment.
• Weight loss: Unintended weight loss is common with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma as it affects the body's ability to process nutrients.

Other Health Risks Caused by Roundup

In addition to cancer, glyphosate exposure has been linked to other potential health risks:

• Reproductive Issues: Some studies suggest glyphosate may affect reproductive health by disrupting hormonal systems. This can lead to reduced fertility and other reproductive problems.
• Liver and Kidney Damage: Chronic exposure to glyphosate has been linked to liver and kidney damage in animal studies. This raises concerns about long-term health impacts on humans.
• Neurological Effects: Emerging research is exploring potential neurological effects of glyphosate, including possible links to neurodegenerative diseases like Parkinson's disease.

The debate over the link between Roundup and cancer continues, with substantial evidence supporting both sides. Plaintiffs in lawsuits argue that Monsanto failed to warn users about the cancer risks associated with glyphosate, while the company and some studies claim there is no definitive proof of such a link. As litigation progresses and new research emerges, the understanding of glyphosate's health impacts will continue to evolve.

For those affected by cancer who suspect Roundup exposure as a cause, seeking legal advice and exploring available resources is crucial. For more information, visit [Lawsuit Legal News](http://www.lawsuitlegalnews.com).

Legal Basis for Roundup Lawsuits

Negligence: Many lawsuits claim that Monsanto was negligent in failing to conduct adequate safety tests and failing to disclose the risks associated with Roundup. Plaintiffs argue that this negligence was not just a lapse in judgment but a deliberate choice to prioritize profits over public safety. This failure to act responsibly has allegedly led to widespread harm, as consumers and agricultural workers were exposed to potentially dangerous chemicals without proper warning or protection.

Failure to Warn: Plaintiffs argue that Monsanto failed to provide sufficient warnings about the potential health risks of Roundup, thereby putting users at risk. The accusations suggest that Monsanto was aware, or should have been aware, of the significant dangers linked to glyphosate, the active ingredient in Roundup. Despite this knowledge, the company is alleged to have chosen not to include adequate warnings on their products, leaving consumers uninformed and vulnerable to serious health issues, including cancer.

Defective Product: Lawsuits often claim that Roundup is a defective product due to its carcinogenic properties and the company's failure to mitigate these risks. Plaintiffs assert that the herbicide’s design and formulation are inherently unsafe, making it unfit for its intended use. The company's failure to address or reduce these known hazards further exacerbates the product's defective nature, leading to serious health consequences for consumers.

Strict Liability: Strict liability holds manufacturers accountable for defective products, regardless of fault. In the context of Roundup, plaintiffs argue that the herbicide's design and chemical composition make it inherently dangerous. This legal principle allows plaintiffs to pursue claims without proving negligence, focusing instead on the fact that Roundup's hazardous properties directly caused harm. The product's risk to human health, particularly its alleged link to cancer, underscores the strict liability claim.

Breach of Warranty: Some lawsuits include claims of breach of warranty, alleging that Monsanto misrepresented Roundup's safety and efficacy. Plaintiffs contend that the company provided express and implied warranties that the product was safe for regular use. However, these assurances are claimed to be false or misleading, as Roundup is accused of causing severe health issues, including cancer, thus violating the trust that consumers placed in these guarantees.

High-Profile Roundup Cases and Settlements

Several high-profile cases have shaped the legal battle over Roundup. Notable verdicts include a $2 billion award to a California couple in 2019 and a $289 million verdict to a groundskeeper in 2018. These cases set significant precedents and have influenced ongoing litigation.

Bayer has settled thousands of lawsuits, offering up to $10.9 billion to resolve claims. Despite these settlements, many cases remain unresolved, and new lawsuits continue to be filed. Recent reductions in punitive damages, such as the $2.25 billion verdict in Pennsylvania being cut to $400 million, reflect ongoing legal negotiations.

 In 2018, a California jury awarded $289 million to Dewayne Johnson, a groundskeeper who developed non-Hodgkin's lymphoma after using Roundup. The verdict was later reduced to $78 million but set a significant precedent for subsequent cases.

In 2019, a federal jury awarded $80 million to Edwin Hardeman, who claimed that Roundup caused his non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. This case was the first federal trial and helped define the legal arguments for many future cases.

These high-profile cases and settlements have significant implications for future litigation, including potential changes in legal strategies and increased regulatory scrutiny. Bayer's continued legal challenges and lobbying efforts may also influence the outcome of future lawsuits.

Filing Your Own Monsanto Roundup Lawsuit

Eligibility Criteria

To be eligible for a Roundup lawsuit, you typically need to meet certain criteria so that your case is viable. Here are some guidelines on eligibility for a Roundup lawsuit:

Proof of Exposure: Documenting your use of Roundup will be crucial. This does not mean a receipt from purchasing the chemical one time; instead, you would need some way of proving that you had long-term exposure to the herbicide. If you were exposed to Roundup through your job, such as working in agriculture or landscaping, usually this proof will revolve around your employment records. If you were exposed in a non-job related manner, like if you lived near areas where Roundup was heavily used, then your proof of residence and proof that Roundup was heavily used in that area would be necessary.

Development of a Related Illness: Proof that you have developed an illness like Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma, the most commonly linked cancer to Roundup exposure, or some other type of cancer is important. This would be proved with detailed medical records of your illness and treatment. And of course, you would need to have developed the illness after your exposure to the chemical.

Consulting with an attorney who specializes in Roundup litigation to assess your specific case is the only real way to determine your exact eligibility.

Timeframe and Statute of Limitations

The timeframe for filing a lawsuit varies by state, with statutes of limitations typically ranging from one to three years after diagnosis or discovery of the link between cancer and Roundup exposure. It is crucial to act promptly to ensure the right to file a claim is preserved.

The Basic Process of Filing a Roundup Lawsuit

Initial Consultation: The process begins with an initial consultation with an attorney to evaluate the merits of the case and determine eligibility.

Gathering Evidence: This step involves collecting medical records, employment history, and documentation of Roundup use to support the claim.

Filing the Complaint: The attorney will file a formal complaint in court, outlining the allegations against Monsanto/Bayer.

Discovery Process: During discovery, both parties exchange information and evidence relevant to the case, including depositions and expert testimony.

Trial and Settlement: If the case goes to trial, it will be heard before a judge or jury. Alternatively, the parties may reach a settlement before or during the trial.

How an Attorney Can Help You with a Roundup Weed Killer Lawsuit

Having an experienced product liability Roundup lawyer is vital in navigating the complexities of a Roundup lawsuit. Legal representation ensures that the plaintiff's rights are protected and increases the likelihood of a favorable outcome.

Choosing an attorney with a proven track record in product liability and toxic tort cases is essential. Potential plaintiffs should seek lawyers with experience in Roundup litigation specifically.

A dedicated legal team will handle all aspects of the case, from gathering evidence to negotiating settlements or presenting the case at trial. They will also provide guidance and support throughout the legal process.

Potential Compensation for a Roundup Lawsuit

Medical Expenses

Medical expenses for cancer treatment can be substantial, including costs for surgeries, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, medications, and follow-up care. Plaintiffs in Roundup lawsuits often seek compensation to cover these expenses, as well as other related costs such as travel for treatment and home care services. Comprehensive medical documentation is crucial in establishing the financial impact of the illness and securing appropriate compensation.

Lost Wages

Compensation can cover lost wages due to illness and treatment, as well as loss of earning capacity.

Pain and Suffering

Non-economic damages for pain and suffering address the physical and emotional impact of the illness.

Punitive Damages

Punitive damages may be awarded to punish the defendant for particularly egregious conduct.

Factors Affecting Compensation

Several factors can influence the amount of compensation awarded in Roundup lawsuits. These include the severity and stage of the cancer, the plaintiff's age and overall health, the extent of exposure to Roundup, and the strength of the evidence linking the cancer to glyphosate. Additionally, legal factors such as jurisdiction, the specific legal claims made, and the presence of punitive damages can also impact compensation amounts.

Challenges in Roundup Litigation

Roundup litigation involves complex legal and procedural challenges, including establishing causation and navigating various state and federal regulations.

Defendants often argue that the plaintiff's cancer was caused by factors other than Roundup exposure. Bayer has argued that compliance with federal regulations should shield them from liability, although courts have frequently rejected this defense.

Effective legal representation and thorough preparation can help mitigate these challenges and increase the likelihood of a successful outcome. That's why it's so important that you speak to a Roundup lawyer and get proper, up-to-date advice. We can help you if you are looking to file a Roundup lawsuit, contact Lawsuit Legal News today for a free consultation. We will contact you within 24 hours of filling out our form or you can call our partner firm at 727-451-6900.

Current Status and the Future of Roundup Litigation

As of July 2024, thousands of Roundup cases remain pending in various courts, with new lawsuits continuing to be filed. High-profile trials and appeals are ongoing, influencing the broader litigation landscape.

Bayer's lobbying efforts aim to influence legislation that could limit future lawsuits. However, any changes in law could face significant opposition from advocacy groups and affected individuals.

The future of Roundup litigation may see increased regulatory scrutiny, more stringent safety warnings, and potentially significant settlements as new cases and evidence emerge.

Get Help from Lawsuit Legal News for Your Roundup Claim

The Roundup lawsuits have emerged as a crucial legal battle concerning the health risks associated with the herbicide glyphosate. With thousands of cases alleging that Roundup caused cancer, particularly non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, it is essential for affected individuals to understand their rights and the legal avenues available to them. The lawsuits have seen significant verdicts and settlements, reflecting the gravity of the claims against Monsanto and Bayer. Key legal theories include negligence, failure to warn, and defective product claims, with various high-profile cases shaping the litigation landscape.

If you or a loved one has been diagnosed with cancer after using Roundup, it is imperative to seek legal advice. Navigating the complexities of product liability litigation requires expertise, and a skilled attorney can help ensure your rights are protected and that you receive the compensation you deserve. Legal representation can also provide the support and guidance needed during such a challenging time.

For more information and to find out if you qualify for a Roundup lawsuit, contact us here or read more on our parent law firm’s Roundup cancer page. Our dedicated team is here to help you navigate the legal process and connect you with experienced attorneys who can assist with your claim.

---

Roundup Lawsuit FAQs and Resources

FAQs about the Roundup Lawsuit

1. What is the basis for the Roundup lawsuits? The lawsuits are primarily based on claims that exposure to Roundup, specifically its active ingredient glyphosate, causes cancer, particularly non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
2. Who can file a Roundup lawsuit? Those who have used Roundup extensively and have been diagnosed with cancer, particularly non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, may be eligible to file a lawsuit. Eligibility depends on the duration and extent of exposure and the timing of the diagnosis.
3. What kind of compensation can plaintiffs expect? Plaintiffs may receive compensation covering medical expenses, both past and future, lost income due to illness, compensation for pain and suffering, and, in some cases, punitive damages intended to punish particularly egregious conduct by the manufacturer.
4. What is the basis for lawsuits? Plaintiffs argue that Monsanto failed to adequately warn users about the cancer risks associated with glyphosate and that the product is inherently defective due to its carcinogenic properties.
5. Why Should I File a Roundup Lawsuit? People exposed to Roundup who suffered significant damages should file a Roundup cancer lawsuit to get compensation for their medical costs and to provide for their family’s future. Compensation can also cover other damages like lost wages, loss of consortium, loss of future earnings, and pain and suffering. And, of course, it is always important to hold negligent companies like Bayer and Monsanto accountable for their actions.

Resources and Support for Sick or Injured Roundup Plaintiffs

Support Groups and Networks: Support groups can provide emotional and practical support for those diagnosed with cancer due to Roundup exposure. Organizations like the Leukemia & Lymphoma Society offer resources and support networks for cancer patients and their families.

Financial Assistance Options: Numerous organizations provide financial assistance to cancer patients. The Cancer Financial Assistance Coalition (CFAC) offers a searchable database of financial resources available to help with medical expenses, transportation, and other costs associated with cancer treatment.

Roundup Lawsuit Glossary of Legal Terms

Understanding these legal terms can help individuals navigate the complexities of Roundup litigation. Each term plays a crucial role in shaping the legal strategies and outcomes of these cases. 

Visit Lawsuit Legal News for more information and updates on Roundup lawsuits.

Breach of Warranty

A legal claim that a product failed to meet the terms of its guarantee. In the context of Roundup lawsuits, plaintiffs argue that Monsanto/Bayer breached implied warranties of safety and effectiveness, leading to harmful exposure.

Causation

The establishment of a direct link between a defendant's actions and the plaintiff's injuries. In Roundup cases, plaintiffs must demonstrate that exposure to glyphosate directly caused their cancer or other health issues.

Class Action

A lawsuit in which one or more plaintiffs file on behalf of a larger group of people who are similarly affected. While many Roundup lawsuits are individual claims, some have been consolidated into class actions or multidistrict litigation (MDL).

Defective Product

A product that is unreasonably dangerous due to a manufacturing defect, design defect, or inadequate warning. Roundup plaintiffs allege that the herbicide is a defective product because of its carcinogenic properties.

Discovery Process

The pre-trial phase in a lawsuit is where both parties exchange information and gather evidence. This includes depositions, document requests, and interrogatories. It is a critical stage in Roundup litigation to build a case.

Negligence

A failure to behave with the level of care that someone of ordinary prudence would have exercised under the same circumstances. Plaintiffs argue that Monsanto/Bayer was negligent in failing to warn about the risks of Roundup.

Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL)

A type of cancer that originates in the lymphatic system, part of the body's immune system. Many Roundup plaintiffs have been diagnosed with NHL, which they claim was caused by glyphosate exposure.

Plaintiff

The person or group who brings a lawsuit against another party (the defendant). In Roundup lawsuits, the plaintiffs are individuals or groups who allege they have suffered health issues due to Roundup.

Punitive Damages

Monetary compensation that is awarded to a plaintiff to punish the defendant for egregious wrongdoing. In Roundup cases, juries have awarded punitive damages to penalize Monsanto/Bayer for their handling of the product's risks.

Settlement

An agreement between parties to resolve a lawsuit outside of court. Bayer has settled many Roundup lawsuits, often for substantial amounts, to avoid the uncertainty of trial verdicts.

Statute of Limitations

The legal deadline for filing a lawsuit. This varies by state and the type of claim. For Roundup lawsuits it typically ranges from one to three years from the date of diagnosis or discovery of the link between cancer and Roundup exposure.

Strict Liability

A legal doctrine holding manufacturers and sellers responsible for defective products, regardless of fault or intent. Plaintiffs in Roundup lawsuits often use strict liability to argue that Monsanto/Bayer should be held accountable for the herbicide's dangers.